Blog
What’s Next
- Refine by Remove filter
- Theme
-
Author
- Mohammed Al-Shawaf
- Ramon Arratia
- Alicia Ayars
- Jennifer Biringer
- Clive Bloom
- Frances Buckingham
- Rob Cameron
- Caroline Chisholm
- Kyra Choucroun
- Cécile Churet
- Lindsay Clinton
- John Elkington
- Tania Ellis
- Jeff Erikson
- Suzanne Fallender
- Paul Gilding
- Chris Guenther
- Alex Hammer
- Andy Hoffman
- Caren Holzman
- Gary Kendall
- Geoff Kendall
- Judy Kuszewski
- Mark Lee
- Simon Lee
- Clarissa Lins
- Geoff Lye
- Heather Mak
- Sam Mountford
- LIz Muller
- Alexander Nick
- Kavita Prakash-Mani
- Jean-Philippe Renaut
- Michael Sadowski
- John Schaetzl
- Preetum Shenoy
- Thomas Singer
- Koann Skrzyniarz
- Rachel Steiman
- Elvira Thissen
- Sophia Tickell
- Luke Upchurch
- Shankar Venkateswaran
- Patrin Watanatada
- Eric Whan
- Kyle Whitaker
- Conor Woodman
- Peter Zollinger
- Date
-

I recently had the pleasure of participating in the annual workshops of SustainAbility’s Engaging Stakeholders network. The theme for the workshops was “value.” That is, how companies can derive greater business value from their sustainability communications and engagement, and how they can deliver greater value to stakeholders and society via their efforts.
-

A question and answer with Wood Turner and Mike Bellamente of Climate Counts, one of the ratings profiled in SustainAbility’s Rate the Raters research series.
1) Looking at the Phase Four paper of Rate the Raters, what resonates most with you?
Now that corporate sustainability ratings have been around awhile, SustainAbility’s Rate the Raters project helps us gauge what the future holds. The phase four paper establishes that rating standards will require greater differentiation moving forward, and that raters will need to distance themselves from the overly saturated data compilation side of the business in order to remain competitive. We at Climate Counts certainly believe this to be true; indeed, if our goal is to point the business community in the direction of climate change awareness and leadership, it should be done with clarity and efficiency, not complexity and duplication.
-

Sustainability challenges are enormous. Ratings can help drive attention and capital (financial, human, consumer) to those companies best positioned to address these challenges. Rate the Raters is a project that aims to make sense of the expanding universe of corporate sustainability ratings and rankings and to improve the quality and transparency of such ratings.
-
More on the similarities and differences between Creating Shared Value and Sustainability.
-

I recently attended the announcement of CR Magazine’s “100 Best Corporate Citizens List” at the New York Stock Exchange, for which the closing keynote was Professor Michael Porter of Harvard Business School. Professor Porter provided an overview of his (and Mark Kramer’s) Creating Shared Value concept, which prompted me to read their recent Harvard Business Review article in earnest.
-
Highlights of feedback and reactions we’ve received so far, and a call for your opinions as we turn to phase four.
-
A challenge to banks: explain the value you provide to society through your core businesses (not just your good works).
-
A new lawsuit against McDonald's shows the challenge of drawing a line between corporate and personal responsibility.
-
Sustainability ratings are more important than ever, which is why they must be improved.
-
On a steamy July evening, my family and I ventured into Prospect Park to listen to the New York Philharmonic.